Why religion is literally false and metaphorically true
\nNew videos DAILY: https:\/\/bigth.ink
\nJoin Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https:\/\/bigth.ink\/Edge
\n———————————————————————————-
\nWhere do your beliefs come from? There’s a school of thought that sees religion as a mind virus that wastes the time and effort of human beings, but evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein offers a more reasonable explanation: “belief systems have flourished because they have facilitated the interests of the creatures involved,” he says. Religious people are evolutionarily fitter than non-believers, not because they are protected by a deity but rather because religion is a form of adaptive evolution. Religion is so widespread because it has massive survival advantages beneath the supernatural elements\u2014that’s what Weinstein refers to as “literally false and metaphorically true”. For example, believing in heaven is literally false\u2014there is no such place\u2014but believing in it keeps your descendants in good standing in the religious community after you’re gone, thus setting your lineage up to continue. The thought itself may be untrue, but the result of the thought is evolutionarily effective. “Despite the fact that human beings think that they have escaped the evolutionary paradigm, they\u2019ve done nothing of the kind, and so we should expect the belief systems that people hold to mirror the evolutionary interests that people have,” Weinstein says. For more from Bret Weinstein, visit bretweinstein.net.
\n———————————————————————————-
\nBRET WEINSTEIN:<\/p>\n
Professor Bret Weinstein has spent two decades advancing the field of evolutionary biology with a focus on adaptive trade-offs. He has made important discoveries regarding the evolution of cancer and senescence as well as the adaptive significance of moral self-sacrifice. <\/p>\n
He applies his evolutionary lens to human behavior in order to sketch a path through the many crises we face as a species. By confronting emerging authoritarianism, and abandoning the archaic distinction between political right and left, we can discover a new model of governance that frees humanity to seek a just, sustainable and abundant future.
\n———————————————————————————-
\nTRANSCRIPT:<\/p>\n
Bret Weinstein: We have minds that are programmed by culture that can be completely at odds with our genomes. And it leads to misunderstandings of evolution, like the idea that religious belief is a mind virus, that effectively these beliefs structures are parasitizing human beings and they are wasting the time and effort that those human beings are spending on that endeavor rather than the more reasonable interpretation, which is that these belief systems have flourished because they have facilitated the interests of the creatures involved.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Our belief systems are built around evolutionary success and they certainly contain human benevolence, which is appropriate to phases of history when there is abundance and people can afford to be good to each other. The problem is if you have grown up in a period in which abundance has been the standard state you don\u2019t anticipate the way people change in the face of austerity. And so what we are currently seeing is messages that we have all agreed are unacceptable reemerging because the signals that we have reached the end of the boom times, those signals are everywhere, and so people are triggered to move into a phase that they don\u2019t even know that they have.<\/p>\n
Despite the fact that human beings think that they have escaped the evolutionary paradigm they\u2019ve done nothing of the kind, and so we should expect the belief systems that people hold to mirror the evolutionary interests that people have rather than to match our best instincts\u2014when we are capable of being good to each other because there\u2019s abundance, we have those instincts and so it\u2019s not incorrect to say that human beings are capable of being marvelous creatures and being quite ethical.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Now I would argue there\u2019s a simple way of reconciling the correct understanding that religious belief often describes truths that, in many cases, fly in the face of what we can understand scientifically, with the idea that these beliefs are adaptive. I call it the state of being literally false and metaphorically true. A belief is literally false and metaphorically true if it is not factual but if behaving as if it were factual results in an enhancement of one\u2019s fitness. To take an example, if one behaves in let\u2019s say the Christian tradition in such a way as to gain access to heaven one will not actually find themselves at the pearly gates being welcomed in, but one does tend to place their …<\/p>\n
For the full transcript, check out https:\/\/bigthink.com\/videos\/bret-weinstein-how-evolution-explains-religion<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Why religion is literally false and metaphorically true New videos DAILY: https:\/\/bigth.ink Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n